What Is Salesforce AI?
Anyone who’s spent time in Salesforce knows Einstein. It was a helpful layer, scoring leads, suggesting next actions, nudging reps in the right direction using...
By Tammy Begley, Director of Marketing Automation & Experience
For years, marketing email has trained customers not to engage.
“Do-not-reply” inboxes. Links that send you elsewhere. Forms that disappear into CRM workflows. Calls to action that rely on someone eventually following up.
In our conversations with clients across B2B, consumer, and highly regulated industries, one theme keeps surfacing: email is still one of the most powerful channels, but it’s fundamentally under-used.
Not because marketers lack ideas, but because email has been treated as a broadcast channel instead of what customers actually want it to be, a way to start a conversation.
That model is starting to break.
We’re seeing growing interest in email experiences that don’t end with a click.
Instead of pushing customers to a landing page or asking them to “contact your account manager”, brands are beginning to ask a simpler question:
What if the email itself was the conversation?
The idea is deceptively simple: invite the recipient to reply. Ask a question. Take an action. Get a response immediately.
When this works well, email stops being a one-way message and becomes a two-way interaction point, capable of answering questions, guiding decisions, and triggering next steps without delay.
For many organisations, this represents a fundamental shift in how email fits into the customer journey.
There’s no shortage of enthusiasm for this model, particularly in B2B.
We hear it constantly from marketing leaders: campaigns generate interest, but the gap between customer intent and human follow-up is where momentum is lost. Two-way email promises to close that gap, handling the “first response” so sales and service teams can focus where they add the most value.
But just as quickly, the conversation turns to caution.
In regulated environments, the risk isn’t hypothetical. One incorrect response, sent to one customer, can have real consequences. That’s why every discussion about conversational email quickly moves beyond features and into governance:
These aren’t blockers. They’re signals of maturity.
Another pattern we’re seeing: even when the technology is ready, behaviour isn’t.
Customers have been conditioned for years not to reply to marketing emails. Changing that expectation takes time, clarity, and intentional design.
The most successful early use cases are explicit:
This isn’t about pretending email is live chat. It’s about using email for what it does best, asynchronous, contextual conversation, and designing for that reality.
One insight is consistent across every client discussion: this is not an “all campaigns” capability.
The organisations seeing the most value are starting with:
Two-way email works best when it’s treated as a precision capability, not a mass-scale replacement for traditional campaigns.
The end of the do-not-reply era raises the bar.
If you invite a response, you need to be ready to handle it accurately, compliantly, and consistently. That requires more than technology. It requires operating models, governance, and cross-team alignment.
At Blueprintx, we see this as a pivotal moment for marketing teams. Not because email is suddenly new, but because it’s finally being expected to behave like the conversations customers have everywhere else.
The future of email isn’t about sending more messages.
It’s about being ready for the reply.
Salesforce are keen to get some earlier adopters on board to give this a try, if you want to be an earlier adopter, lets us know and we can connect you with the Salesforce Product team.